The whole meeting is timeboxed to last from one to four hours, depending on how long your sprints are.
Some scrum teams mistakenly label the sprint review meetings as a “demo” or “show and tell” meeting where they demonstrate and list out what was achieved during the sprint, but demonstration is just one aspect to this Agile ceremony. During the sprint review, the scrum development team, product owner, and business stakeholders gather together to discuss the sprint results. It is held at the end of each scrum sprint. The sprint review is one of the five pivotal scrum ceremonies. Let’s dive into the whole scrum sprint review vs sprint retrospective confusion and learn what makes both meetings uniquely useful and integral to the scrum framework. And that’s just scratching the surface.The sprint review is about the product, while the sprint retrospective is about the team.įocus on the process and deliverables for every meeting, and the sky is the limit to how productive and engaged your team can become. While the sprint review helps you to regularly meet customer expectations, retrospectives allows scrum teams to become faster, smarter, and even happier.
In a nutshell, the sprint review is about the product, while the sprint retrospective is about the team. Sprint review and sprint retrospective may sound a bit similar, especially if you’re just starting to use scrum as your Agile product management framework. Even experienced scrum teams sometimes don’t know the difference and either run only one of the meetings, or worse: merge them into some weird and often detrimental combination.īut there’s a huge difference between the sprint review and sprint retrospective because both meetings serve completely different purposes. Home > Agile > Sprint Review vs Sprint Retrospective: The Critical Difference
0 kommentar(er)
